Well, we didnapos;t get to have our GIS�meeting today because Wendy wasnapos;t able to (sheapos;s not doing very much GIS�work these days anyway, she says). But Paul and I or Paul and I and Connie (the IT�guru) are going to meet sometime next week, probably Tuesday or Wednesday to plan. When Paul and I had our meeting we pretty much covered what he wanted to talk about, but Iapos;m not sure if heapos;s planning on doing any reassigning of projects or what. We are supposed to be getting two new biologists - one probably at the end of November and the other probably by the end of the year, so that should lighten the workload of some of the staff.
Anyway, Wendy showed me today how to add stuff to the Dataviewer and it is amazingly simple, so Iapos;ll be doing some work with that. I added the documented spawning sites for the Gulf sturgeon that I had created and also deleted some stuff that wasnapos;t really useful like old tiger road files and old managed areas. I�also created a data archive folder on the X drive and moved all of that old data into it. Eventually it would be really nice to move to geodatabases. I wonder if weapos;ll do that while Iapos;m here. As far as the "list" of things to add, there really isnapos;t a physical list, but weapos;re going to work something out so that I know what needs to be added to the library and Dataviewer.
I got the chance to ask Wendy about a couple of questions I had for others, but her answers may help me solve some of my dilemmas. For the potential sturgeon spawning data Iapos;ve been having issues with the MS�rivers not having any site information, and apparently thereapos;s a good reason for that - this office didnapos;t collect those GPS�points. Basically, if itapos;s okay with everyone (Paul, Frank) I can exclude those rivers from the final shapefile because there isnapos;t enough data to make anything coherent about it. I�still need to ask Frank though if he wants more attribute information other than river and site number in the shapefile.�I also asked her about the conradina data for Vivian. Vivian wants to keep the shapefiles separate but thereapos;s really no reason for this that I can see for the rest of the staff. So Iapos;m going to keep the originals in that project folder that sheapos;s working out of, merge the 4 point layers together and then (hopefully) get enough metadata information so that we can have some and then move it into the panhandle folder and then to the Dataviewer. On�an amusing side�note, the guy we originally got this plant data from is one of the people coming to work here at the end of the year. So I could just ask him in person. :)
I spoke with Sandy briefly about the candidate mussel ranges and she says this project is going to be ongoing because they are always going to be out in the field finding candidate mussels. The issue right now for the final range maps is that they donapos;t know whether or not theyapos;ll have the funding to list the species (Iapos;m not sure why money is a factor, but thatapos;s what she said) until after the presidential election. So basically Iapos;m just going to be adding data as she gives it to me. She sent me a table with a few new points to add, so Iapos;ll do that tomorrow.
Oh, and I spent the morning and some of the afternoon completing seven CBRA�determinations, but Melody isnapos;t in until Wednesday. Ah, well. At least theyapos;re out of the way.
Anyway, thatapos;s�my day. Kind of bored now and I still have 25 minutes to go.
bowers ohio, belcehan deluxe hotel, belcekiz beach, belcekiz beach hotel, belcekiz beach hotel olu deniz.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий